Hilton Falls to 72% as Steyer Surges Into Second Place in California Primary

Tom Steyer Is Surging Into the Spot Steve Hilton Needs to Survive California's Governor Primary

Three days ago, Steve Hilton looked safe. The former Fox News host and sole competitive Republican in California's gubernatorial primary held an 86% implied probability of advancing to November's general election. Then the latest Emerson College poll landed: Tom Steyer at 22%, Hilton at 21%. One percentage point separating second place from elimination, with mail ballots already in voters' hands and Election Day set for June 2.

This is not a Hilton collapse. His poll numbers have held relatively steady in the low 20s across multiple surveys. What changed is Steyer. The billionaire Democrat, who ran for president in 2020, has consolidated support from a fractured Democratic field at exactly the wrong moment for Hilton. Xavier Becerra leads at 28% in the Emerson survey and appears locked into the first advancing slot. The entire contest for second place now sits on a knife's edge.

California's top-two primary system sends the two highest vote-getters to November regardless of party. That means Hilton doesn't need to beat every Democrat. He needs to beat all but one. And until this week, the Democratic vote was split enough to make that math comfortable. Steyer's consolidation has changed the arithmetic.

Loading live prices…

Hilton's Odds Drop 13 Percentage Points in Three Days, and the Market Is Pricing a Squeeze, Not a Collapse

Hilton's implied probability on prediction markets has fallen from 86% to 72% across Kalshi and Polymarket since May 28. On Kalshi, he trades at 73%. On Polymarket, 72%. The spread between platforms is minimal, which suggests both pools of bettors are reading the same signal: Steyer's late surge makes Hilton's path to second place genuinely uncertain for the first time in this race.

The distinction between a collapse and a squeeze matters. A collapse means the candidate did something wrong. A squeeze means the competitive environment shifted around them. Hilton's own polling has barely moved. The PPIC poll from May 28 had him at 20%, and his RealClearPolling average sits at 21.6%. What moved is Steyer's number, from mid-teens in earlier surveys to 22% in Emerson. That single shift reshuffled the entire probability distribution for who finishes second.

A 72% implied probability still makes Hilton the favorite to advance. But the market is telling you that roughly one in four scenarios now ends with Hilton on the outside. Three days ago, that number was closer to one in seven.

Why California's Top-Two Primary Is the Perfect Trap for the Only Republican in the Race

California's jungle primary was designed to reward broad appeal over partisan intensity. Every candidate appears on one ballot, and the top two finishers advance. In theory, this benefits a Republican like Hilton who can consolidate the GOP vote while Democrats split among themselves. In practice, the system creates a specific vulnerability: if Democratic voters coalesce around a single alternative, the Republican's locked-in base becomes a ceiling rather than a floor.

Republicans make up roughly 24% of California's registered voters, while Democrats hold about 46%. In a field where Katie Porter polls at 5%, Matt Mahan at 5%, and Chad Bianco at 12%, the non-Becerra Democratic vote has been fragmented enough to keep Hilton safe. But Steyer's rise to 22% suggests that fragmentation is ending. Democratic voters appear to be consolidating around two candidates, Becerra and Steyer, rather than scattering across four or five.

The historical precedent is instructive. In the 2018 gubernatorial primary, Democrats nearly locked Republicans out of the top two entirely. John Cox squeaked into second place with 26.2% of the vote, while Democrat Antonio Villaraigosa finished third at 13.1%. The margin was comfortable that cycle, but only because Democratic consolidation happened too late. This time, it may be happening early enough to matter.

What's Fueling Steyer's Late Surge and Why It Threatens Hilton Specifically

Steyer's momentum has a clear catalyst. California Democrats have expressed lukewarm enthusiasm for the field replacing Gavin Newsom, and Steyer has positioned himself as the progressive alternative to Becerra, who is perceived as the establishment pick. Eric Swalwell's recent exit from the race freed up a slice of the Democratic electorate that appears to have migrated toward Steyer rather than distributing evenly.

At the final televised debate, opponents attacked Hilton as an "inexperienced talking head." That framing may not have moved Republican voters, but it could have nudged undecided Democrats toward a familiar Democratic name. Steyer, who spent over $250 million on his 2020 presidential bid, has the resources to blanket the airwaves in these final days.

The Los Angeles Times reported on May 28 that the second-place contest had tightened into a genuine two-person race between Hilton and Steyer. That framing itself becomes a feedback loop: the more media coverage treats the race as a Hilton-Steyer battle, the more strategic Democratic voters have reason to consolidate behind Steyer to ensure two Democrats advance.

The Case for Hilton: Why 72% Might Still Be Too Low

The strongest argument in Hilton's favor is structural. Republican voters in California are highly motivated, and Hilton is effectively the only Republican with a realistic shot at advancing. Chad Bianco polls at 12%, but he has not demonstrated the fundraising or organizational capacity to surge past Hilton. Republican consolidation is already baked in. Democratic consolidation behind Steyer is the variable, and it may not materialize in actual vote totals the way polls suggest.

Polls in California primaries have historically underestimated Republican candidates. The state's mail-ballot system means that a large share of votes were cast before Steyer's surge registered in public surveys. If 40% to 50% of ballots were returned before the Emerson poll's May 29 field date, those votes were locked in during a period when Hilton's position looked stronger and Steyer's looked weaker.

There is also the question of whether Steyer's poll gains reflect genuine voter commitment or name recognition. His 22% in Emerson may include soft supporters who recognize his name from 2020 but ultimately skip the governor's race or vote for a different Democrat. Hilton's 21%, built on a smaller but more cohesive partisan base, could prove stickier on Election Day.

What Happens Next: June 2 Resolves Everything

This market resolves on June 2 when California counts its primary ballots. There is no ambiguity in the outcome: the top two vote-getters advance, and everyone else goes home. Hilton's final campaign push has focused on the state Capitol, emphasizing cost-cutting and bureaucratic reform in a closing argument aimed at consolidating persuadable voters outside the GOP base.

At 72%, the market says Hilton is still more likely to advance than not. But 72% is a far cry from 86%, and the direction of the move matters as much as its magnitude. The repricing has been steady and driven by new polling data, not by rumor or thin trading. If a final poll drops before Tuesday showing Steyer at 23% or 24%, the market could compress further.

The core tension is irreducible: Steve Hilton's fate depends less on his own performance than on whether California Democrats can coordinate behind two candidates in a crowded field. The prediction market says they probably can't. But "probably" is doing a lot of work when one percentage point is all that separates second from third.